Home Blog Page 807

Tinycards is a powerful, but fun, flash card tutor (review)

Flash cards don’t have the most “fun” reputation, am I right? The utterance of the term brings about the specter of a coming test; of hours or repetition in your bedroom….memorizing, guessing, and re-guessing until either you have the facts implanted in your brain, or you fall asleep on your bed. Either way, it’s not a fun prognosis.

But! For eons, the same was said concerning learning a second language; that is, until a now-famous app called “Duolingo” arrived. The app gamified the traditionally arduous task of learning new languages….combining the use of digital flash cards along with an almost platforming-style of quiz gaming, making it a top name in the Play Store.

Now Duolingo has finally brought a similar approach to all kinds of academic topics, with Tinycards. Tinycards is a free, kiddo-friendly app that allows you expand beyond language, choosing the subject you want, and you have (usually) multiple stacks of flash cards to take on.

 Setup

After downloading from the Play Store, you either register or log in (you can log in with your Duolingo credentials, or other social media options). Once in, you arrive at the app’s home screen. Here you have four tabs across the top: Home (we’re going to unusually wait to cover this one to the end), Search, Add (more on that in a minute), and Profile.

Lets’s start with Profile. Here you can edit your profile, and adjust multiple settings (notifications, username, password, audio settings, profile photo, etc). Nothing out of the ordinary here.

App Experience

So with that out of the way, let’s move to the meat of the app: the Search tab. Here is where you simply type in your subject keywords, and a corresponding match list of card stacks appears. You pick one and off you go.

Playing a stack is pretty ingenious. In all cases, you start very simple: you get 2-3 flash cards; clicking on them flips it giving you the answer right off. After these first tutor cards, the app gradually starts inter-mixing quiz-type cards. These start off as multiple choice, but can also evolve into fill-in-the-blank and other more interactive questions.

As you progress through the cards, you complete a “level”. As with a platforming-type game, you continue to level-up, graduating to harder and harder content for you to master.

Social

The app does have a social aspect to it, too. Primarily, while there’s a base level of cards created by Duolingo, there’s an awful lot more that have been created by other app users. You can choose to play individual card decks from a given user, or you can “follow” that person to get notified of any new content put out by them, as well.

You can be a creator, too! This brings us to the Plus (+) tab of the app interface. Here you can select create, customize, and publish your own Tinycards content for others to enjoy. You can choose to share more privately or put them out for all to enjoy; your call.

 

Visuals & Sound

If you’ve tried the Duolingo language app, then Tinycards will feel immediately familiar. The colors are bright but simple; no busy screens to be found here. The interface is extremely friendly, with smiling faces and non-threatening visuals all-around.

The same can be said for the audio; there’s little in the way of background sounds. When you get an answer right you are rewarded with a bright chirp. If you get one wrong, the resulting sound isn’t punitive, but more of an “uh-oh! let’s try that again” sound….almost encouraging. My kiddos loved it as it made a tougher set of cards a lot less discouraging as they tried to conquer it.

Overall

As a dad to school-age kiddos, Tinycards is a fantastic app for their devices. It’s a killer downtime filler; for the car, for a waiting room, for any downtime where if they want screen time, you can at least make it productive in addition to fun. It’s an app I do not see leaving anyone’s device for the foreseeable future.

Download Tinycards on the Play Store here.

Caterpillar’s latest rugged smartphone comes with a huge battery, doubles as a power bank

0

Not a fan of the fragile glass smartphones and prefer rugged, sturdy devices instead? Then you might be interested to know that Caterpillar just announced its latest durable smartphone called the Cat S41.

The rugged phone carries MIL-SPEC 810G military certification to ensure it doesn’t get harmed even if exposed to the most extreme conditions like intense heat and cold. It should also be able to survive if dropped onto concrete from up to 5 feet 9 inches. On top of that the device is also waterproof/dustproof (IP68 certified).

When it comes to specs, this highly durable phone features a 5-inch fullHD super bright display optimized for outdoor use and relies on an octa-core 2.3GHz MediaTek chipset to keep the lights on. The phone also includes 3GB of RAM and 32GB of expandable storage, as well as a 13-megapixel primary camera with LED flash, autofocus with PDAF and an 8-megapixel selfie camera. Both benefit from an underwater mode.

The highlight of the new Cat S41? It’s massive 5,000 mAh battery which promises up to 38 hours of 3G talk time and 44 days standby. On top of that, the phone benefits from the so-called Battery Share functionality which allows owners to use it as a backup power bank to charge their other devices.

The handheld device also includes programmable shortcut keys for Push to Talk (PTT) or SOS (Lone Worker app). What’s more, it takes advantage of a textured, extra grip design which ensures it doesn’t slip from users’ hands.

Interested parties will be able to purchase the new Cat S41 for $449 from the official catphones.com website (deliveries start on November 16), as well as Amazon, Best Buy, eBay, Home Depot and B&H.

LG G6+ and Q6 arrive in the US as Amazon Prime Exclusive phones

0

Amazon’s Prime Exclusive family of phones is getting bigger. The retail giant has announced it will be offering four new unlocked LG smartphones, including the middle-range LG Q6 which offers a FullVision 18:9 display on the cheap. Amazon’s Prime Exclusive handsets are offered at reduced prices but include (personalized) ads on their lock screen.

Anyway, starting today you’ll be able to place a pre-order for the LG G6, LG Q6, LG G6+ and LG X charge. The phones will start shipping to customers in November.

While you may be quite familiar with the LG G6 flagship which was the company’s first phone to boast a bezel-less display with aspect ratio, you’re might be a bit confused about the rest of the other models. If that’s the case, let us tell you a bit more about each device.

LG Q6

Price: $229.99 ($70 off its retail price)

Announced a few months ago, the LG Q6 is a watered down LG G6 version which offers a 5.5-inch bezel-less FullVision display with the modern 18:9 aspect ratio, on the cheap. Apart from the stunning display, the phone includes a Snapdragon 435 processor, 3GB of RAM and 32GB of expandable storage.

Unlike the premium LG G6, the LG Q6 does not offer a dual-camera setup but relies on a single 13-megapixel sensor on the back. It also includes a 5-megapixel camera for selfie-taking purposes.

LG G6+

Price: $499 ($300 off its retail price)

The LG G6+ is a version of the LG G6 which offers more storage and 32-bit Hi-Fi Quad DAC. Apart from that, it’s almost identical to the standard LG G6 coming with a 5.7-inch QHD+ display with rounded corners, a Snapdragon 821, 4GB of RAM, dual 13-megapixel cameras, IP68 certification and a 3,300 mAh battery.

But instead of bundling 64GB of internal storage it comes equipped with 128GB (expandable up to 2TB via the microSD card).

LG X charge

Price: $149 ($50 off its retail price)

Want a phone with a big battery? Then you might want to consider purchasing the LG X charge which takes advantage of a 4,500 mAh power house. Apart from its stand-out feature aside, the LG X Charge boasts specs on the low-end side of the spectrum including a 5.5-inch HD LCD display, Snapdragon 425 processor, 2GB of RAM, 16GB of expandable storage, 13-megapixel/5-megapixel camera combo and Android 7.1 Nougat out of the box.

We should also note that the LG G6 – which is available for Prime members for only $399, LG G6+ and LG Q6 are all compatible with AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon networks, but the LG X charge supports AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile networks.

You’ll now have to pay for some “premium” Alexa skills

0

From smart speakers to intelligent light bulbs to thermostats, the number of Alexa-enabled devices has been steadily growing Amazon’s public release of the Echo in mid-2015. And it’s no wonder the tech giant is looking for new ways to monetize its success in the smart home market.

Case in point, Amazon recently announced it’s rolling out subscriptions for “premium” Alexa skills. Skills are applications that extend the basic functionalities that come pre-integrated with Alexa, and while Alexa has a ton of functionality out of the box, the real magic happens when you dig into the world of third-party skills.

And now Amazon will allow developers to make money with their third-party Alexa skills. The first skill to get a subscription fee is the Jeopardy! one, so Alexa device owners will be able to access 6 additional clues every day in exchange for a $1.99/month fee.

However, if you are a Prime member, Amazon will let you have access to this premium feature in Jeopardy! free of charge. This is perhaps another way in which the retail giant is trying to attract customers to its Prime service. Yet, the company says that not all future premium skills will necessarily be free for those who are part of the Prime family.

It remains to be seen whether developers will find this option particularly helpful, especially considering how common Amazon Prime subscriptions are and that they are intimately tied to Echo device usage.

Nokia 6 Arte Black with 4GB of RAM and 64GB storage coming to the US soon

0

Back at MWC 2017 in Barcelona, HMD said it will launch a special edition of its Nokia 6 handset dubbed Arte Black. Now, the phone has popped up on Amazon listed as “Temporary out of stock”. However, customers can place an order for the device now and Amazon pledges to send out an email about the estimated delivery date as soon as it has more information at hand.

The phone is available with a $299 price tag, which makes it $70 more expensive than the standard Nokia 6 version. Why the difference you might be wondering? Well, for starters the Arte Black model boasts a glossy back cover, as opposed to the matte rear of the regular Nokia 6. Furthermore, the special edition includes 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, unlike the standard version which only features 3GB of RAM and 32GB of storage.

Amazon will offer the Nokia 6 Arte Black version unlocked. The phone is compatible with GSM/LTE carriers like AT&T and T-Mobile.

Users who are contemplating spending money on a Nokia 6 or Nokia 6 Arte Black might also be interested to know that Nokia announced this week a beta testing program for Android 8.0 Oreo. For the time being, only Nokia 8 users are eligible to join, but soon Nokia 6 owners will be able to do so, as well.

Fiio X7 Mark II Android HiFi Audio Player Review

Last year, we reviewed a nice surprise from Fiio – its entry into the high-end digital audio player market (DAP). The Chinese company has historically been known as a manufacturer of bang-for-the-buck HiFi audio devices – and according to the audiophile community, one of the best ones out there. The X7 was new territory for Fiio in two ways: 1) A player made and priced to compete with higher-end competitors, and 2) Its first hack at using Android to drive it.

In a nutshell, we found the X7 to be a great first try at a high-end Android DAP, but in some ways it felt like a beta. At the $700 range, the design and function need to be near flawless. Well, Mark II of that device is now here, and we can see that Fiio worked very hard since. Fiio’s catchphrase for the X7 II is “Thoroughly Transformed, Inside and Out”, and that certainly is the case. Let’s go over the improvements and if we can recommend the X7 II at its still substantial $650 price.

Design

The packaging of the Fiio X7 II is noteworthy, particularly because the company includes not one but two cases – a TPU wrap and a premium-feeling leather cover-up. Not many companies are this generous. What’s more, a screen protector comes pre-installed. Something else you won’t typically find in a device box is a torx screwdriver. If you know anything about the original X7, you may remember that it had a unique removable module feature that provided the flexibility to upgrade the amp or add balanced output. This design is back with the X7 II.

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
The amp module design of the X7 II is the same as the original, so they are interchangeable.

As for the player itself, the form doesn’t stray too far from the original, but it’s definitely more than just a touch-up. Most notably, the edge with the physical controls is lifted in an eye-catchingly angled manner. This creates a notch for the volume scroll wheel to reside in. The scroll wheel itself is also an upgrade from the volume rocker in the original, though we wish that Fiio made it a bit firmer. It locks to each increment (with a click sound) but very lightly and with a little play to it.

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
The X7 II is still a chunky, silver aluminum block like before, but feels much better in hand.

Two of our complaints in our review of the original X7 were that the display was raised above the chassis (increasing its vulnerability to mishaps) and a hump on the back that made the thick device even thicker. Fiio addressed both of these things with the X7 II. The screen is now flush and the elevation on the back is less noticeable. The unit lost about 1mm of thickness and 8 grams of weight.

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP

Function

Internally, Fiio made some natural component progressions, such as doubling the RAM from 1GB to 2GB and internal storage from 32GB to 64GB. What’s more, there’s now two microSD card slots that can each handle 256GB (so a whopping 512GB externally).

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
The two microSD trays are flush on the flat side of the X7 II, and require an ejector pin to access.

Battery capacity has also been bumped from 3,500mAh to 3,800mAh. But it looks to be using the same quad-core Rockchip RK3188 processor as before, along with same spec’d 4″ LCD IPS display with a measly 480×800 pixel resolution. I’m sure Fiio’s thinking was to focus on the components that really matter in an audiophile player. We just need the processor and display to work, and they do just fine.

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
The 8 hour battery rating is via the 3.5mm output. Using Balanced, we saw more like 7 hours. This isn’t spectacular. Also, while we appreciate better fidelity wireless audio with the AptX codec, we would’ve expected at least AptX HD in a high-end audio player.

More importantly is what upgrades have been made to improve sound quality? The original model used the latest from ESS Technology (the same high-end audio chip company that LG partners with on its V-series flagships), and the same is true here. Sound on the X7 II is processed with the SABRE ES9028PRO DAC, which particularly makes big steps to improve frequency response and signal-to-noise ratio.

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
A strength of the X7 is the ability to use Tidal HiFi streaming.

Our biggest gripe about the original X7 was that we intermittently heard interference when streaming music over WiFi. Fiio acknowledged the issue and rectified it in the X7 II by not just using better components but shielding area of the PCB that could cause it. And we’re happy to report that we don’t hear any noise whatsoever, even with highly sensitive Shure SE846 earphones.

On the software side, the X7 II features a custom Android 5.0 build (no, it’s far from the latest from Google but better than version 4.4.4 KitKat from before) and a revamped player interface. We didn’t find the original X7’s player to be very user friendly, and it sounds like that pain was heard. The X7 II software is a breath of fresh air.

On the Android side of things, we’re looking at a bare-bones version of Lollipop with minimal pre-loaded apps (basic things like clock, email, file explorer, and browser). The Play Store is on there, so you can install what you want. But being that you probably didn’t get this device to watch movies and surf the web, what you’ll add is music apps that you use.

One thing to note is that Fiio has a nifty software trick to throw the X7 II into a “Pure Music” mode. This essentially turns off every software feature but Fiio’s player. This way, if you want to use stored music, you don’t have to keep stuff on that you don’t need. The Fiio Music software is still available in Android mode via an app.

Sound

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
The stock amp module on the X7 II now includes a Balanced jack (2.5mm, TRRS).

Plainly said, Fiio wasn’t kidding when it said that the X7 II was revamped on the inside as well as out. As a user of the original X7, I can say that Mark II is a whole ‘nother animal (in a completely good way).

One of my biggest gripes with the first X7 was the sterile sound. It was detailed, no doubt, but Fiio’s reference aim sided too much for analytical listeners than those who want toe-tapping fun and energy. It’s immediately apparent with the X7 II that Fiio turned up the speakers, so to speak. The sound is now stupendously full and engaging. This is thanks in part to a commanding mid-range. That said, balance is beautifully struck, not just in the frequency response but in the delivery. The X7 II is equally as musical as it sonically skillful.

Separation is a grade-A quality of this DAP. There’s a real nice cleanness and discernible positioning to the different sounds. Its airiness serves well for the perceived dimensionality. Another notable quality is the sub-bass. It is deep and powerful, but in no way overdone. Moving into the mid-range, I don’t hear any bleeding. It’s all clean and articulated, even up to the elaborate treble. No particular frequency range is favored; each is equally detailed and present enough to be analyzed and appreciated.

I really struggle to find any flaw in the sound of the X7 II, which in itself leaves me at a loss for words. I review a lot of audio gear and can always pick off an imperfection or two in high-end devices. I just can’t here. This is what my ears want to hear, and what my headphones need to show their potential. As far as I’m concerned, Fiio has a hit with the X7 II.

Well, there is one thing…

If you recall my mention that the X7 II has standard 3.5mm (single-ended) and balanced 2.5mm jacks, turns out that they don’t sound quite the same. My impressions above were with the balanced output, which the audio system clearly favors. I don’t put Fiio completely at fault, because the company is simply trying to adhere to today’s audiophile standards. Many high-end mobile audiophiles use the 2.5mm balanced standard, and Fiio is far from the first company to do a DAP with standard and balanced options. Astell&Kern and Onkyo are two big examples that embrace balanced output.

So with that said, I find the standard output of the X7 II to be still be good, but it’s missing the key aspects that I praised with the balanced output. The full/liveliness takes a clear step back. The detail and balance is still present, but the punch and dynamics is average.

Final Thoughts

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP

So back to the question from the beginning – Is the X7 II worth it? Well, the answer comes with a caveat. If you’re going to use the balanced output, then yes, yes, and yes. Unfortunately, that condition limits most of the mobile audio listeners out there. Most people probably don’t even know what a balanced cable is, let alone the ability to use one with their current headphones.

But for what it is, Fiio did an amazing job on the X7 II. It can definitely stand among the best DAPs out there, and at a price that undercuts them. Do not overlook this DAP if you’re in the market, especially for one that runs Android and can utilize streaming music services.

Fiio X7 Mark II product page

LG bit off more than it could chew

0

LG started off 2017 alright with the fine G6 in the Spring. Sure, the Galaxy S series continued to best it in terms of screen and camera quality, but LG did a respectable job and was closing the gap. Our eyes then turned to the V30. We expected it to basically be a plus size version of the G6, with a couple extras like the HiFi DAC and bigger battery. As it turns out, LG had more progression in store for the V30. This sounded a super promising smartphone: even less bezel than the G6, a curved design, f/1.6 aperture primary and f/1.9 wide-angle cameras (versus the G6’s f/1.8 standard and f/2.4 wide-angle lenses), updated HiFi DAC, and last but not least the long overdue switch to an OLED screen. LG was finally going to give Samsung some serious competition – or so we thought.

The problems began even before the V30 launched. We thought that LG would learn from the V20’s terrible release gap last year. But the announcement came and weeks went by with no word of a release date. Reviewers got impatient and just did their V30 reviews with their pre-production units. The Note 8 was on the market three weeks before consumers started getting their hands on it (in US carriers). LG is still hurrying to get the device out in other countries. It hasn’t even been available unlocked yet, which is slated all the way to early December.

Then, as the public got to playing with it, quality control looked to be added to the V30’s shortcomings. Many reports came in about noticeable color uniformity and banding when the screen is in low brightness (about 30% and under).

The screen on my T-Mobile unit – notice the really dark area on the bottom, and some across the top.

What’s more, dark areas are also unacceptably over-darkened in low brightness, particularly ruining video watching. Essentially, the quality of LG’s P-OLED screen noise-dives in low brightness. Some folks got lucky with a good screen, but the issue is wide spread. Plainly said, we shouldn’t be playing a screen quality lottery with a device we spent $800 or more on, especially from an established manufacturer like LG.

V30 and Note 8 low brightness comparison – courtesy of Ars Technica.

Every other aspect of the phone is superb. I still continue to use it as my daily driver, despite the display problems. As a previous Note 8 user, I’m completely fine with this display at higher brightness. But then when I’m using the phone in bed, I’m reminded again how inferior the quality is. It really is night and day – even in how the Note 8’s display maintains its colors at even the most extreme viewing angle (the V30 has a noticeable color shift). Even the OnePlus 3’s OLED display last year did not have these kind of issues. It’s simply inexcusable by LG.

But LG is not just hurting themselves with its display deficiency this year. Google entrusted the company to produce the higher-end Pixel 2 XL. It is unfortunate to use the same P-OLED panel, and yes, reports of quality issues have similarly trickled in, but with a topping of screen burn-in vulnerability. The smaller Pixel 2 isn’t encountering these problems, because it’s a Samsung-made AMOLED panel. Google says it’s looking into these Pixel 2 XL reports, but we don’t know what the outcome could be.

Don’t get me wrong; I’m not LG-bashing or biased towards Samsung. I want LG to succeed and am hopeful with each announcement. I’ve had each V-series device and look up to the company’s effort. I don’t want the smartphone world to just be ruled by Samsung and Apple. But the fact of the matter is that LG just doesn’t fully commit. Its mobile division has some terrific efforts, such things that no one else does like the dedicated HiFi DAC, aptx-HD wireless audio, wide-angle camera, and DSLR-like manual camera controls. But while it has the potential to be a serious competitor, other parts in the company fail the phones. LG needs to hold themselves up to a higher standard. A company this big cannot have its name behind a display that has a variance in quality this noticeable. It also needs the allocate the appropriate resources to get this thing manufactured and out the door in a timely manner. LG needs to either fully commit or quit. Samsung has a near perfect device now.

Do you share our same feelings? How good or bad is your V30 display? Continue the conversation in the comments below!

Android 8.1 Developer Preview now available

0

Google today released its first Developer Preview of Android 8.1 Oreo for app developers, testers, and early adopters. While the release candidate number might signal a minor change, there’s quite a bit of important stuff happening when you look deeper.

Here’s what Google highlights as part of the new release (API level 27):

  • Android Go memory optimizations and targeting — Android 8.1 includes a set of memory optimizations for Android Go configurations (1GB or less of memory). We’ve added new hardware feature constants so you can now target the distribution of your apps and APK splits to normal or low-RAM devices running Android 8.1 and later.
  • Neural Networks API — as part of our efforts to bring machine intelligence to Android, we’ve added a Neural Networks API via the NDK. It enables hardware-accelerated inference operations on supported devices. We designed the Neural Networks API as a foundational layer for ML frameworks like TensorFlow Lite — Google’s upcoming cross-platform ML framework for mobile — as well as Caffe2 and others. Stay tuned for TensorFlow Lite announcements.
  • Autofill enhancements — we’ve made it easier for password managers and other Autofill services to use the Autofill framework. For example, we’ve added support for more UI customization of the Save dialog, as well as setAutofillOptions() for users to set credit card expiration using a spinner.
  • Shared memory API — this new API lets apps allocate shared memory for faster access to common data. Apps can map anonymous shared memory and manage protection controls using the SharedMemory API. The API is parcelable, AIDL friendly, and exposes useful features like removing write permissions.

As is the case with other Developer Previews, this Android 8.1 Oreo build is available to registered developers and Android beta testers. For those of you who want to install the system image on your device manually, Google has offered up releases for the Nexus 5X, Nexus 6P, Pixel, Pixel XL, Pixel C, Pixel 2, and Pixel XL 2.

A stable and formal version of this build should reach the aforementioned devices in the near future.

Gear Up: Samsung makes some of the best Galaxy S8 Plus cases

0

Yeah, we know that the Galaxy S8 and S8 Plus have already been out for some time, but that isn’t stopping folks from still picking these devices up today. In fact, with all of the issues surrounding the Pixel 2 XL, I’ve seen folks opt for the Galaxy S8 Plus as a replacement while Google figures out what’s going on with its displays.

This means that folks are still looking for the best cases for their shiny and new Galaxy S8 Plus, and that brings us to the options. While you can hit Amazon for some cheap, yet great cases, some will overlook the OEM cases that Samsung has created for its lineup of devices.

Today, we’re taking a look at four different options – the Alcantara Cover, Silicone Cover, LED View Cover, and Keyboard Cover.

Silicone Cover

Starting off with the basic options, you can’t get much more basic than a silicone case for the Galaxy S8 Plus. Samsung’s own silicone case pretty much falls in line with what you expect from a case like this, while giving owners a bit extra.

The outside of the case is made from silicone, making the device more comfortable to hold, and less likely to accidentally slip out of your hands. Around the sides, the silicone has been raised for all of the different buttons on the Galaxy S8 Plus, while the bottom of the case is cut out, altogether. This gives you easy access to the charging port and 3.5mm headphone jack, while not leaving you worrying about covering up the speaker.

The real benefit from this case (and most of these cases) comes with the camera cutout. It’s well-documented how annoying the placement of the fingerprint scanner has been for the Galaxy S8 lineup and the Galaxy Note 8. However, with the cutout on the back, there’s a cutout for the camera and heart rate sensor, and a separate cutout for the fingerprint scanner. 

This makes life a WHOLE lot easier if you still like using the fingerprint scanner, or even if you need to use it when you iris scanning is acting funky.

Moving to the inside of the case, the Silicone option features a soft interior which will help keep your Galaxy S8 from getting scratched up with extended usage. The only gripe that I have here comes from owning the white version of this case. There’s definitely some concern about using a white case and keeping things look pretty after awhile.

Nonetheless, the Silicone case is a great option to consider, and you can hit the button below to snag one for yourself.

Buy the Samsung Silicone Cover!

Alcantara Cover

This is my favorite case that I have ever used with my Galaxy S8 Plus. The Alcantara case doesn’t look that impressive from the start, but then when you take it out of the packaging, you are immediately impressed.

The Alcantara case feels like a sweater for your precious device, a feeling that is extremely welcome regardless of the situation. Obviously, this won’t be the case you take with you if you’re going on a hike, but when you get home and ready to go out for dinner, the Alcantara looks absolutely gorgeous.

As with the Silicone case, the camera cutout makes life so much better by making it easier to access the fingerprint scanner without smudging the camera lens. The buttons are raised just enough to make them clicky, but don’t protrude enough to stick out like a sore thumb.

Another recurring theme here is the cutout at the bottom of the case, providing easy access for the charging port, headphone jack, and speaker. The only complaint that I have with this case comes from the fabric itself.

Over my extended usage period with the Alcantara case, I found the case shedding fibers occasionally. This would leave fibers on my display, forcing me to wipe them away from time to time. Hopefully, this won’t turn into a case of male-pattern baldness, but only time will tell.

Pricing may be a little steep for some as this is priced at $49.99, but in my opinion, it’s well worth it if you want to keep things looking good and don’t want a generic case.

Buy the Samsung Alcantara Cover!

LED View Cover

Generally, I’m not a huge fan of flip cases, as I want to get into my device as fast as possible, and the same rings true with the LED View cover. While this case is rather durable, it’s just a bit too thick for my taste but does include some interesting use cases.

The LED View cover takes advantage of your display, while ensuring that you always know what time it is. Plus, whenever you receive a notification, the outer case will light up, letting you know what app the notification is coming from.

Moving around the case, there is a cutout on the front for the earpiece, and the side features labels for the volume up and down buttons, as well as the Bixby button. These aren’t actually buttons themselves, but let you know where to push if you need to silence a call or activate Bixby quickly.

Flipping the case open, there’s a small cutout capable holding one or two credit cards (or an ID) if you want to leave the wallet at home and take advantage of Samsung Pay. There’s also some soft-feeling material on the inside of the case, again, helping to keep your Galaxy S8 Plus protected.

Around the edges of the inner case, there are cutouts at the top, bottom, as well as cutouts for the various buttons around the edge of your device. This is great for providing easy access, but is rather unlikely to keep the device protected if dropped from a substantial height.

Buy the Samsung LED View Cover!

Keyboard Cover

This case threw me off the most out of the bunch, and is still one of the weirdest “cases” that I’ve used. I thought it was neat when Samsung announced the cover at the Galaxy S8 event, and you can definitely tell this is an attempt to appease those who have been wanting a hardware keyboard to use.

The Keyboard Cover actually comes in two pieces – the rear cover, and the keyboard. The rear cover itself is nothing more than a hard shell with cutouts for the buttons and easy access to the ports on the bottom.

However, some slight cutouts can be found on the sides of the hardshell cover where the keyboard portion will rest when not in use. When you’re ready to use the keyboard, you’ll need to (gently) pry it off the back, and then flip it around and attach it.

As soon as you attach it, you will notice your display moved up slightly to account for the space being taken up by the keyboard. General interaction is not impeded, except for the navigation buttons, which are now activated using the keyboard itself. Unfortunately, this is what drove me nuts the most.

Instead of being able to remap the hardware buttons (I know, I know), you’re stuck using Samsung’s backwards orientation of the navigation keys. THEN, when you are done using the keyboard, Samsung automatically reverts the navigation button orientation on your device, forcing you to go back into the settings and change things back to normal.

As for the keyboard itself, it’s rather tactile, and I was able to easily reply to some emails with minimal errors. That’s a pretty impressive feat considering the fact that I suffer from finger-itis, and have never had luck with hardware keyboards on mobile devices.

Nonetheless, if you can ignore the glaring issue surrounding the navigation keys, the Keyboard Cover is a viable option to give you the tactile feedback you want.

Buy the Samsung Keyboard Cover!

Google Pixel 2, Pixel XL 2 review

It must be fall again. We’re in that all-important time of year where the big companies trot out their brightest and best, hoping to steal your attention and money. The Google Pixel 2 and its larger counterpart, the Google Pixel XL 2, are now available.

The question du jour is, “What’s your opinion of the Pixel 2?” Well, it’s either that or a variation wondering whether it’s worth upgrading from an existing flagship phone. It’s a highly coveted device that promises to build on its successor. The easy answer should be yes, right? Let’s dig in a bit and talk about the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2.

A Qualifying Statement

Before going further, I’d like to qualify my statements and perspective. I’ve had the two phones in my possession for around twelve days, including two busy weekends. In other words, I am in no way saying that these words are final. I’m reserving the right to make adjustments in the coming days and weeks as I spend more time with the phones.

As much as I would have liked to put one or both of these phones through their paces in time for the press embargo, I simply couldn’t. Keep in mind as you read other reviews that most outlets have spent roughly the same amount of time.

Assuming some of the largest outlets out there got the phone on the day of introduction, that means they still spent less than two weeks with it. With that said, there are some sites who have done a good job diving deep into a particular area including benchmarks, performance, and more.

The review units provided to us by Google were both Just Black in color. As someone who used the Google Pixel as his main device over the last year, I’ve become quite familiar with it. Also worth noting is that my personal phone is also black.

First Impressions

Taking the phones out of the box and giving it a quick once-over, I was hit with mixed feelings. I really like the subtle changes in design; the glossy top section looks gorgeous in my opinion. However, both were a little too close to last year’s model for me to get too excited.

Let’s be honest: the Pixel is not the sexiest device on the planet. Google never really sold it on its looks or sleek lines and there are plenty of phones that beat it the cosmetic department. The Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2 are slight modifications on the existing models but don’t stray very far for 2017.

I’m reminded of how Google’s early Chromebooks, the CR-48, were unfinished and basic looking. Further, it also calls to mind when we see devices with fake shells or cases that hide the final product.

This is not to say, though, that the other colors wouldn’t be a completely different experience. There’s something about the way Google mixes the black and white (with a hint of red on power button) that signals “modern Google”.

If you look at the new line of products as a whole, they all seem to fit. Even though they have different materials and do vastly different things, they feel cohesive and like they’re all part of a family. To me, though, the all black phones look like beta versions or unfinished takes on the more appealing counterparts.

This is all personal opinion, of course, and has nothing to do with a “review”. That is, unless you are like me and want to know if the new stuff is better looking or much more advanced than the old stuff.

If you are using a Google Pixel or Pixel XL now, there’s not enough here to outright suggest the upgrade. Find the right discount or incentive, such as switching carriers, and it’s easier to make the recommendation.

Jump back a generation to the Nexus 5X or 6P and it’s much more obvious. The hardware performance alone is worth the upgrade. Plus you’re dealing with much a smoother, and cohesive operating system in Android 8.0 Oreo. It’s Android as it is supposed to be done.

As for the actual build quality, I find no issues with the Pixel 2 or Pixel XL 2. The phones feel solid in hand, if not a little bit utilitarian. Looking the phone over and getting a feel for it, the Pixel 2 is more my style and fits my hand size. Last year’s Pixel XL was always just a little bit too big for me to fall in love with it, especially with a case on it.

This year’s Pixel XL 2 also verges on the edge of being too cumbersome to me. The Pixel 2 feels much more in line with what I like for reaching in the pocket, waking up, and using with one hand.

To be fair, the larger screen is great for just about all practical purposes. Reading text, watching video, and playing games all benefit from the extra space. Even the weight is almost negligible, too. The preference between the two is going to be a personal choice.

About that Pixel XL 2 Display

Before moving on, though, I definitely have to touch base on the difference in the tech behind the two displays. If you’ve been looking into pre-ordering the Pixel XL 2, you likely already know about the issues plaguing some users. Indeed, even pre-launch review units are experiencing burn-in and less than desirable image quality. Yes, after only a few days and weeks, there’s chatter about poor images and what figures to be burned in navigation bars.

For what it’s worth, I review unit does not have any of the problems. This is not, however,  to suggest it’s perfect. In fact, after powering both on and placing them next to each other, the first thing I noticed about the larger phone was that the picture was more blue-ish and more drab.

Dig around and you’ll find that this comes down to LG manufacturing the screen in the Pixel XL 2 and Samsung creating the one for the Pixel 2. On paper, the larger phone has the same screen size and tech as the V30. And, depending on how deep of a rabbit hole you climb into, you’ll find that the LG phone is not without its own issues.

Mileage will vary per user. Some of the loudest complaints come from the smallest crowds. You’ll find plenty of angry mob types on forums and threads but it could be a simple case of angry few making noise loud enough for all.

To be fair, some of the images I’ve seen online look downright nasty. Google definitely has its hands full right now as it tries to look into the issue and/or fix it. I have no doubt that Google will do its part to replace or repair the problem devices. Given the flagship nature of the phone, it doesn’t want this to last long.

Build Quality

The Pixel 2 is more squared off and slab-like than its predecessor. I happen to like the slight changes from the first generation, even if they’re minimal. There’s less glass than in last year’s phone, but it also give us less to scratch or scuff. As for the other material, the texture is more rough and gives a better grip.

A welcome change in this year’s line, water resistance, is one of the only gripes I had with last year’s model. Given that so many other phones come with the feature I come to expect it in any handset commanding flagship pricing. Really, it should be standard for all mobile devices.

You might go an entire year without needing water resistance, but the one time your phone catches a sudden rain or poolside cannonball splash, you’ll be glad it’s there. I appreciate that both the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2 have water resistance.

Flip the phones over and you’ll find that there’s a slight lip that encircles the rear camera. It’s a minimal protrusion but it’s worth pointing out. It doesn’t make them feel uneven when lying on the back, but there’s just enough here to catch on a surface or to potentially scuff. Put the handsets in a case and you won’t have any problems.

Ask your snobby friends to speak on the build of the Pixel phones and a common argument is that they have too big of a bezel. By ways of comparison, they sure do. Last year’s models we more prominent than the new phones; the Pixel 2 has more “wasted space” than its larger counterpart. There’s a justifiable reason.

Queue up some music or a YouTube video and give it a listen. Google moved the bottom speaker from below the handset into a position directly under the screen. The front-facing stereo setup is excellent and offers up an incredible sound. I suppose there could be just a little bit trimmed from the top and bottom bezels but I can’t imagine Google leaving extra space for no reason at all. Plus, it looks symmetrical when turned on its side.

Camera

Phone makers almost always brag about the camera experience on their devices, especially the bigger names who deliver flagships on a regular basis. Yes, they have gotten much better over the years, and the software experience always improves, too.

Google, for its part, made a very big deal out of its camera and the highest DxOMark score to date. After spending just a few days with the Pixel and Pixel XL it was very obvious that this was more than lip service and indistinguishable benchmarks. The Pixel camera was the real deal and its 90 score was incredible and well worth the praise.

For this year we find that Google has managed to up the ante even more, pulling in a commanding 98 DxOMark score. Beating all others again, I couldn’t wait to test the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2. Would it be incremental and something that matters only on paper?

Flickr Gallery of Camera Samples

Pixel 2 & Pixel XL 2 Camera Samples

I’ve already captured some incredible photos with excellent detail and very accurate color. The shutter is super fast, mowing through pictures at a rapid rate. Things will get even better over the next few months as Google enables the Pixel Visual Core. Suffice it to say, the out of box experience now is already a winner.

I look forward to testing out the optical image stabilization and electronic stabilization. The demo at Google’s unveiling tells us it should be almost revolutionary and change video captured on smartphones.

Performance

Man, I miss the headphone jack. My office is only a couple of miles from home, and I don’t travel too far around town, but I almost always have my phone plugged directly into my stereo. I wish I could tell you that I had Bluetooth in my truck but I don’t. In truth, pretty much all modern cars do have the technology, including my wife’s. Nevertheless, I love plugging in for Audible or Google Play Music because terrestrial radio sucks.

If you rely on an auxiliary cord on a regular basis, you’re going to take issue with the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2. Indeed, after mocking Apple and others for removing the plug only one year earlier, Google removed the 3.5mm jack from both phones.

I would have loved a pair of inexpensive Bluetooth earbuds in the box. Or, perhaps maybe a discount code for the new Pixel Buds. If the industry is going to evolve, Google and others should help make the changes easier.

Given the hardware that powers the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2, you’d expect a snappy experience. You get that here; there’s nothing I’ve thrown at the phones yet that’s caused them to stutter or slow. Android 8.0 Oreo is as smooth as ever, building slightly on the great foundation that was 7.0 Nougat.

If there’s one word that I can use to sum up the Pixel line of devices it’s “cohesive”. For good reason, it’s the full Android experience as intended by Google. While they’re not yet a hardware manufacturer, Google does an excellent job in working with the platform and phone makers.

I’m a huge fan of how Google integrates its apps and services. The list of pre-loaded titles has evolved over the years but today’s suite feels appropriate. It skews a little more toward new smartphone adopters with Allo, Duo, and Messages, but longtime Google users can easily install Hangouts, Google+, or other apps.

As much as I like the idea of squeezing the phones to trigger Google Assistant, I don’t think I will be using it that often. There are already a number of ways to pull it up, some of which feel just as intuitive. I would really like a setting in the phone that lets me trigger an app or function. I’d use it much more if I could squeeze to launch email.

Conclusion

It’s really hard to throw shade at the Pixel 2 or Pixel XL 2, at least on paper. Display issues aside for the select few users of the Pixel XL 2, the general consensus seems to be that these phones are winners.

I love the fact that Google Photos lets me upload my pictures and videos at original resolution. Really, I’d enjoy that with any quality of camera, but it’s extra good when you have the top-rated smartphone camera on the market.

The Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2 are nice steps forward in the family of devices; the changes are in the right areas and are appreciated. To me, it’s not worth the $200 difference to go for the larger model. That’s a personal preference, though, and a call you’ll have to make. For now, if you can wait until the display problems are cleared up by Google, I would suggest holding on just to be safe.

I would like to see wireless charging added to the Pixel line. To be honest, I was surprised that Google didn’t add it this time around. It’s not as if we’re still waiting on an industry standard to emerge.

Should you upgrade?

If you own an existing Pixel or Pixel XL, I am going to suggest sitting tight for now. There’s enough changed from last year to qualify as an upgrade, but it’s certainly evolutionary and not revolutionary. Given that your current model already has or is in the midst of receiving Android 8.0, you’re not missing out on much.

For everyone else, though… If you’re sitting on something older from another phone maker, the Pixel 2 is certainly worth a look.  There’s something to be said about a stripped down, lean version of Android, particularly if you’ve never experienced it. I encourage long time Samsung, LG, or HTC users to give it a try.

On a related note, I’ve always tried to sway friends and family away from buying phones through carriers. In addition to OEMs baking in the extra software and apps we often find things loaded by the service provider. You might not realize it, but all that junk matters.

Spend some time with a Nexus or Pixel phone and you’ll be tempted to stay with Google’s hardware. The total package gets better with each iteration and the 2017 bundle is a tough one to beat.

For $650 the Pixel 2 is definitely worth the price. It was the right cost for last year’s model and the updates for this just gives you more for the same cost. What’s more, it keeps you from wandering into that area of $800+ devices that look sexier but really just do the same stuff. You’ll have to figure out for yourself if it’s worth the cost difference to go with the XL 2.

She’s not the most beautiful girl in school, but she is super smart and really understands your needs. You won’t go broke dating her for awhile, you’ll have a lot of fun together, and you may come to appreciate that the important stuff is below the surface.