Home Blog Page 807

Nokia 6 Arte Black with 4GB of RAM and 64GB storage coming to the US soon

0

Back at MWC 2017 in Barcelona, HMD said it will launch a special edition of its Nokia 6 handset dubbed Arte Black. Now, the phone has popped up on Amazon listed as “Temporary out of stock”. However, customers can place an order for the device now and Amazon pledges to send out an email about the estimated delivery date as soon as it has more information at hand.

The phone is available with a $299 price tag, which makes it $70 more expensive than the standard Nokia 6 version. Why the difference you might be wondering? Well, for starters the Arte Black model boasts a glossy back cover, as opposed to the matte rear of the regular Nokia 6. Furthermore, the special edition includes 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, unlike the standard version which only features 3GB of RAM and 32GB of storage.

Amazon will offer the Nokia 6 Arte Black version unlocked. The phone is compatible with GSM/LTE carriers like AT&T and T-Mobile.

Users who are contemplating spending money on a Nokia 6 or Nokia 6 Arte Black might also be interested to know that Nokia announced this week a beta testing program for Android 8.0 Oreo. For the time being, only Nokia 8 users are eligible to join, but soon Nokia 6 owners will be able to do so, as well.

Fiio X7 Mark II Android HiFi Audio Player Review

Last year, we reviewed a nice surprise from Fiio – its entry into the high-end digital audio player market (DAP). The Chinese company has historically been known as a manufacturer of bang-for-the-buck HiFi audio devices – and according to the audiophile community, one of the best ones out there. The X7 was new territory for Fiio in two ways: 1) A player made and priced to compete with higher-end competitors, and 2) Its first hack at using Android to drive it.

In a nutshell, we found the X7 to be a great first try at a high-end Android DAP, but in some ways it felt like a beta. At the $700 range, the design and function need to be near flawless. Well, Mark II of that device is now here, and we can see that Fiio worked very hard since. Fiio’s catchphrase for the X7 II is “Thoroughly Transformed, Inside and Out”, and that certainly is the case. Let’s go over the improvements and if we can recommend the X7 II at its still substantial $650 price.

Design

The packaging of the Fiio X7 II is noteworthy, particularly because the company includes not one but two cases – a TPU wrap and a premium-feeling leather cover-up. Not many companies are this generous. What’s more, a screen protector comes pre-installed. Something else you won’t typically find in a device box is a torx screwdriver. If you know anything about the original X7, you may remember that it had a unique removable module feature that provided the flexibility to upgrade the amp or add balanced output. This design is back with the X7 II.

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
The amp module design of the X7 II is the same as the original, so they are interchangeable.

As for the player itself, the form doesn’t stray too far from the original, but it’s definitely more than just a touch-up. Most notably, the edge with the physical controls is lifted in an eye-catchingly angled manner. This creates a notch for the volume scroll wheel to reside in. The scroll wheel itself is also an upgrade from the volume rocker in the original, though we wish that Fiio made it a bit firmer. It locks to each increment (with a click sound) but very lightly and with a little play to it.

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
The X7 II is still a chunky, silver aluminum block like before, but feels much better in hand.

Two of our complaints in our review of the original X7 were that the display was raised above the chassis (increasing its vulnerability to mishaps) and a hump on the back that made the thick device even thicker. Fiio addressed both of these things with the X7 II. The screen is now flush and the elevation on the back is less noticeable. The unit lost about 1mm of thickness and 8 grams of weight.

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP

Function

Internally, Fiio made some natural component progressions, such as doubling the RAM from 1GB to 2GB and internal storage from 32GB to 64GB. What’s more, there’s now two microSD card slots that can each handle 256GB (so a whopping 512GB externally).

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
The two microSD trays are flush on the flat side of the X7 II, and require an ejector pin to access.

Battery capacity has also been bumped from 3,500mAh to 3,800mAh. But it looks to be using the same quad-core Rockchip RK3188 processor as before, along with same spec’d 4″ LCD IPS display with a measly 480×800 pixel resolution. I’m sure Fiio’s thinking was to focus on the components that really matter in an audiophile player. We just need the processor and display to work, and they do just fine.

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
The 8 hour battery rating is via the 3.5mm output. Using Balanced, we saw more like 7 hours. This isn’t spectacular. Also, while we appreciate better fidelity wireless audio with the AptX codec, we would’ve expected at least AptX HD in a high-end audio player.

More importantly is what upgrades have been made to improve sound quality? The original model used the latest from ESS Technology (the same high-end audio chip company that LG partners with on its V-series flagships), and the same is true here. Sound on the X7 II is processed with the SABRE ES9028PRO DAC, which particularly makes big steps to improve frequency response and signal-to-noise ratio.

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
A strength of the X7 is the ability to use Tidal HiFi streaming.

Our biggest gripe about the original X7 was that we intermittently heard interference when streaming music over WiFi. Fiio acknowledged the issue and rectified it in the X7 II by not just using better components but shielding area of the PCB that could cause it. And we’re happy to report that we don’t hear any noise whatsoever, even with highly sensitive Shure SE846 earphones.

On the software side, the X7 II features a custom Android 5.0 build (no, it’s far from the latest from Google but better than version 4.4.4 KitKat from before) and a revamped player interface. We didn’t find the original X7’s player to be very user friendly, and it sounds like that pain was heard. The X7 II software is a breath of fresh air.

On the Android side of things, we’re looking at a bare-bones version of Lollipop with minimal pre-loaded apps (basic things like clock, email, file explorer, and browser). The Play Store is on there, so you can install what you want. But being that you probably didn’t get this device to watch movies and surf the web, what you’ll add is music apps that you use.

One thing to note is that Fiio has a nifty software trick to throw the X7 II into a “Pure Music” mode. This essentially turns off every software feature but Fiio’s player. This way, if you want to use stored music, you don’t have to keep stuff on that you don’t need. The Fiio Music software is still available in Android mode via an app.

Sound

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP
The stock amp module on the X7 II now includes a Balanced jack (2.5mm, TRRS).

Plainly said, Fiio wasn’t kidding when it said that the X7 II was revamped on the inside as well as out. As a user of the original X7, I can say that Mark II is a whole ‘nother animal (in a completely good way).

One of my biggest gripes with the first X7 was the sterile sound. It was detailed, no doubt, but Fiio’s reference aim sided too much for analytical listeners than those who want toe-tapping fun and energy. It’s immediately apparent with the X7 II that Fiio turned up the speakers, so to speak. The sound is now stupendously full and engaging. This is thanks in part to a commanding mid-range. That said, balance is beautifully struck, not just in the frequency response but in the delivery. The X7 II is equally as musical as it sonically skillful.

Separation is a grade-A quality of this DAP. There’s a real nice cleanness and discernible positioning to the different sounds. Its airiness serves well for the perceived dimensionality. Another notable quality is the sub-bass. It is deep and powerful, but in no way overdone. Moving into the mid-range, I don’t hear any bleeding. It’s all clean and articulated, even up to the elaborate treble. No particular frequency range is favored; each is equally detailed and present enough to be analyzed and appreciated.

I really struggle to find any flaw in the sound of the X7 II, which in itself leaves me at a loss for words. I review a lot of audio gear and can always pick off an imperfection or two in high-end devices. I just can’t here. This is what my ears want to hear, and what my headphones need to show their potential. As far as I’m concerned, Fiio has a hit with the X7 II.

Well, there is one thing…

If you recall my mention that the X7 II has standard 3.5mm (single-ended) and balanced 2.5mm jacks, turns out that they don’t sound quite the same. My impressions above were with the balanced output, which the audio system clearly favors. I don’t put Fiio completely at fault, because the company is simply trying to adhere to today’s audiophile standards. Many high-end mobile audiophiles use the 2.5mm balanced standard, and Fiio is far from the first company to do a DAP with standard and balanced options. Astell&Kern and Onkyo are two big examples that embrace balanced output.

So with that said, I find the standard output of the X7 II to be still be good, but it’s missing the key aspects that I praised with the balanced output. The full/liveliness takes a clear step back. The detail and balance is still present, but the punch and dynamics is average.

Final Thoughts

Fiio X7 Mark II DAP

So back to the question from the beginning – Is the X7 II worth it? Well, the answer comes with a caveat. If you’re going to use the balanced output, then yes, yes, and yes. Unfortunately, that condition limits most of the mobile audio listeners out there. Most people probably don’t even know what a balanced cable is, let alone the ability to use one with their current headphones.

But for what it is, Fiio did an amazing job on the X7 II. It can definitely stand among the best DAPs out there, and at a price that undercuts them. Do not overlook this DAP if you’re in the market, especially for one that runs Android and can utilize streaming music services.

Fiio X7 Mark II product page

LG bit off more than it could chew

0

LG started off 2017 alright with the fine G6 in the Spring. Sure, the Galaxy S series continued to best it in terms of screen and camera quality, but LG did a respectable job and was closing the gap. Our eyes then turned to the V30. We expected it to basically be a plus size version of the G6, with a couple extras like the HiFi DAC and bigger battery. As it turns out, LG had more progression in store for the V30. This sounded a super promising smartphone: even less bezel than the G6, a curved design, f/1.6 aperture primary and f/1.9 wide-angle cameras (versus the G6’s f/1.8 standard and f/2.4 wide-angle lenses), updated HiFi DAC, and last but not least the long overdue switch to an OLED screen. LG was finally going to give Samsung some serious competition – or so we thought.

The problems began even before the V30 launched. We thought that LG would learn from the V20’s terrible release gap last year. But the announcement came and weeks went by with no word of a release date. Reviewers got impatient and just did their V30 reviews with their pre-production units. The Note 8 was on the market three weeks before consumers started getting their hands on it (in US carriers). LG is still hurrying to get the device out in other countries. It hasn’t even been available unlocked yet, which is slated all the way to early December.

Then, as the public got to playing with it, quality control looked to be added to the V30’s shortcomings. Many reports came in about noticeable color uniformity and banding when the screen is in low brightness (about 30% and under).

The screen on my T-Mobile unit – notice the really dark area on the bottom, and some across the top.

What’s more, dark areas are also unacceptably over-darkened in low brightness, particularly ruining video watching. Essentially, the quality of LG’s P-OLED screen noise-dives in low brightness. Some folks got lucky with a good screen, but the issue is wide spread. Plainly said, we shouldn’t be playing a screen quality lottery with a device we spent $800 or more on, especially from an established manufacturer like LG.

V30 and Note 8 low brightness comparison – courtesy of Ars Technica.

Every other aspect of the phone is superb. I still continue to use it as my daily driver, despite the display problems. As a previous Note 8 user, I’m completely fine with this display at higher brightness. But then when I’m using the phone in bed, I’m reminded again how inferior the quality is. It really is night and day – even in how the Note 8’s display maintains its colors at even the most extreme viewing angle (the V30 has a noticeable color shift). Even the OnePlus 3’s OLED display last year did not have these kind of issues. It’s simply inexcusable by LG.

But LG is not just hurting themselves with its display deficiency this year. Google entrusted the company to produce the higher-end Pixel 2 XL. It is unfortunate to use the same P-OLED panel, and yes, reports of quality issues have similarly trickled in, but with a topping of screen burn-in vulnerability. The smaller Pixel 2 isn’t encountering these problems, because it’s a Samsung-made AMOLED panel. Google says it’s looking into these Pixel 2 XL reports, but we don’t know what the outcome could be.

Don’t get me wrong; I’m not LG-bashing or biased towards Samsung. I want LG to succeed and am hopeful with each announcement. I’ve had each V-series device and look up to the company’s effort. I don’t want the smartphone world to just be ruled by Samsung and Apple. But the fact of the matter is that LG just doesn’t fully commit. Its mobile division has some terrific efforts, such things that no one else does like the dedicated HiFi DAC, aptx-HD wireless audio, wide-angle camera, and DSLR-like manual camera controls. But while it has the potential to be a serious competitor, other parts in the company fail the phones. LG needs to hold themselves up to a higher standard. A company this big cannot have its name behind a display that has a variance in quality this noticeable. It also needs the allocate the appropriate resources to get this thing manufactured and out the door in a timely manner. LG needs to either fully commit or quit. Samsung has a near perfect device now.

Do you share our same feelings? How good or bad is your V30 display? Continue the conversation in the comments below!

Android 8.1 Developer Preview now available

0

Google today released its first Developer Preview of Android 8.1 Oreo for app developers, testers, and early adopters. While the release candidate number might signal a minor change, there’s quite a bit of important stuff happening when you look deeper.

Here’s what Google highlights as part of the new release (API level 27):

  • Android Go memory optimizations and targeting — Android 8.1 includes a set of memory optimizations for Android Go configurations (1GB or less of memory). We’ve added new hardware feature constants so you can now target the distribution of your apps and APK splits to normal or low-RAM devices running Android 8.1 and later.
  • Neural Networks API — as part of our efforts to bring machine intelligence to Android, we’ve added a Neural Networks API via the NDK. It enables hardware-accelerated inference operations on supported devices. We designed the Neural Networks API as a foundational layer for ML frameworks like TensorFlow Lite — Google’s upcoming cross-platform ML framework for mobile — as well as Caffe2 and others. Stay tuned for TensorFlow Lite announcements.
  • Autofill enhancements — we’ve made it easier for password managers and other Autofill services to use the Autofill framework. For example, we’ve added support for more UI customization of the Save dialog, as well as setAutofillOptions() for users to set credit card expiration using a spinner.
  • Shared memory API — this new API lets apps allocate shared memory for faster access to common data. Apps can map anonymous shared memory and manage protection controls using the SharedMemory API. The API is parcelable, AIDL friendly, and exposes useful features like removing write permissions.

As is the case with other Developer Previews, this Android 8.1 Oreo build is available to registered developers and Android beta testers. For those of you who want to install the system image on your device manually, Google has offered up releases for the Nexus 5X, Nexus 6P, Pixel, Pixel XL, Pixel C, Pixel 2, and Pixel XL 2.

A stable and formal version of this build should reach the aforementioned devices in the near future.

Gear Up: Samsung makes some of the best Galaxy S8 Plus cases

0

Yeah, we know that the Galaxy S8 and S8 Plus have already been out for some time, but that isn’t stopping folks from still picking these devices up today. In fact, with all of the issues surrounding the Pixel 2 XL, I’ve seen folks opt for the Galaxy S8 Plus as a replacement while Google figures out what’s going on with its displays.

This means that folks are still looking for the best cases for their shiny and new Galaxy S8 Plus, and that brings us to the options. While you can hit Amazon for some cheap, yet great cases, some will overlook the OEM cases that Samsung has created for its lineup of devices.

Today, we’re taking a look at four different options – the Alcantara Cover, Silicone Cover, LED View Cover, and Keyboard Cover.

Silicone Cover

Starting off with the basic options, you can’t get much more basic than a silicone case for the Galaxy S8 Plus. Samsung’s own silicone case pretty much falls in line with what you expect from a case like this, while giving owners a bit extra.

The outside of the case is made from silicone, making the device more comfortable to hold, and less likely to accidentally slip out of your hands. Around the sides, the silicone has been raised for all of the different buttons on the Galaxy S8 Plus, while the bottom of the case is cut out, altogether. This gives you easy access to the charging port and 3.5mm headphone jack, while not leaving you worrying about covering up the speaker.

The real benefit from this case (and most of these cases) comes with the camera cutout. It’s well-documented how annoying the placement of the fingerprint scanner has been for the Galaxy S8 lineup and the Galaxy Note 8. However, with the cutout on the back, there’s a cutout for the camera and heart rate sensor, and a separate cutout for the fingerprint scanner. 

This makes life a WHOLE lot easier if you still like using the fingerprint scanner, or even if you need to use it when you iris scanning is acting funky.

Moving to the inside of the case, the Silicone option features a soft interior which will help keep your Galaxy S8 from getting scratched up with extended usage. The only gripe that I have here comes from owning the white version of this case. There’s definitely some concern about using a white case and keeping things look pretty after awhile.

Nonetheless, the Silicone case is a great option to consider, and you can hit the button below to snag one for yourself.

Buy the Samsung Silicone Cover!

Alcantara Cover

This is my favorite case that I have ever used with my Galaxy S8 Plus. The Alcantara case doesn’t look that impressive from the start, but then when you take it out of the packaging, you are immediately impressed.

The Alcantara case feels like a sweater for your precious device, a feeling that is extremely welcome regardless of the situation. Obviously, this won’t be the case you take with you if you’re going on a hike, but when you get home and ready to go out for dinner, the Alcantara looks absolutely gorgeous.

As with the Silicone case, the camera cutout makes life so much better by making it easier to access the fingerprint scanner without smudging the camera lens. The buttons are raised just enough to make them clicky, but don’t protrude enough to stick out like a sore thumb.

Another recurring theme here is the cutout at the bottom of the case, providing easy access for the charging port, headphone jack, and speaker. The only complaint that I have with this case comes from the fabric itself.

Over my extended usage period with the Alcantara case, I found the case shedding fibers occasionally. This would leave fibers on my display, forcing me to wipe them away from time to time. Hopefully, this won’t turn into a case of male-pattern baldness, but only time will tell.

Pricing may be a little steep for some as this is priced at $49.99, but in my opinion, it’s well worth it if you want to keep things looking good and don’t want a generic case.

Buy the Samsung Alcantara Cover!

LED View Cover

Generally, I’m not a huge fan of flip cases, as I want to get into my device as fast as possible, and the same rings true with the LED View cover. While this case is rather durable, it’s just a bit too thick for my taste but does include some interesting use cases.

The LED View cover takes advantage of your display, while ensuring that you always know what time it is. Plus, whenever you receive a notification, the outer case will light up, letting you know what app the notification is coming from.

Moving around the case, there is a cutout on the front for the earpiece, and the side features labels for the volume up and down buttons, as well as the Bixby button. These aren’t actually buttons themselves, but let you know where to push if you need to silence a call or activate Bixby quickly.

Flipping the case open, there’s a small cutout capable holding one or two credit cards (or an ID) if you want to leave the wallet at home and take advantage of Samsung Pay. There’s also some soft-feeling material on the inside of the case, again, helping to keep your Galaxy S8 Plus protected.

Around the edges of the inner case, there are cutouts at the top, bottom, as well as cutouts for the various buttons around the edge of your device. This is great for providing easy access, but is rather unlikely to keep the device protected if dropped from a substantial height.

Buy the Samsung LED View Cover!

Keyboard Cover

This case threw me off the most out of the bunch, and is still one of the weirdest “cases” that I’ve used. I thought it was neat when Samsung announced the cover at the Galaxy S8 event, and you can definitely tell this is an attempt to appease those who have been wanting a hardware keyboard to use.

The Keyboard Cover actually comes in two pieces – the rear cover, and the keyboard. The rear cover itself is nothing more than a hard shell with cutouts for the buttons and easy access to the ports on the bottom.

However, some slight cutouts can be found on the sides of the hardshell cover where the keyboard portion will rest when not in use. When you’re ready to use the keyboard, you’ll need to (gently) pry it off the back, and then flip it around and attach it.

As soon as you attach it, you will notice your display moved up slightly to account for the space being taken up by the keyboard. General interaction is not impeded, except for the navigation buttons, which are now activated using the keyboard itself. Unfortunately, this is what drove me nuts the most.

Instead of being able to remap the hardware buttons (I know, I know), you’re stuck using Samsung’s backwards orientation of the navigation keys. THEN, when you are done using the keyboard, Samsung automatically reverts the navigation button orientation on your device, forcing you to go back into the settings and change things back to normal.

As for the keyboard itself, it’s rather tactile, and I was able to easily reply to some emails with minimal errors. That’s a pretty impressive feat considering the fact that I suffer from finger-itis, and have never had luck with hardware keyboards on mobile devices.

Nonetheless, if you can ignore the glaring issue surrounding the navigation keys, the Keyboard Cover is a viable option to give you the tactile feedback you want.

Buy the Samsung Keyboard Cover!

Google Pixel 2, Pixel XL 2 review

It must be fall again. We’re in that all-important time of year where the big companies trot out their brightest and best, hoping to steal your attention and money. The Google Pixel 2 and its larger counterpart, the Google Pixel XL 2, are now available.

The question du jour is, “What’s your opinion of the Pixel 2?” Well, it’s either that or a variation wondering whether it’s worth upgrading from an existing flagship phone. It’s a highly coveted device that promises to build on its successor. The easy answer should be yes, right? Let’s dig in a bit and talk about the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2.

A Qualifying Statement

Before going further, I’d like to qualify my statements and perspective. I’ve had the two phones in my possession for around twelve days, including two busy weekends. In other words, I am in no way saying that these words are final. I’m reserving the right to make adjustments in the coming days and weeks as I spend more time with the phones.

As much as I would have liked to put one or both of these phones through their paces in time for the press embargo, I simply couldn’t. Keep in mind as you read other reviews that most outlets have spent roughly the same amount of time.

Assuming some of the largest outlets out there got the phone on the day of introduction, that means they still spent less than two weeks with it. With that said, there are some sites who have done a good job diving deep into a particular area including benchmarks, performance, and more.

The review units provided to us by Google were both Just Black in color. As someone who used the Google Pixel as his main device over the last year, I’ve become quite familiar with it. Also worth noting is that my personal phone is also black.

First Impressions

Taking the phones out of the box and giving it a quick once-over, I was hit with mixed feelings. I really like the subtle changes in design; the glossy top section looks gorgeous in my opinion. However, both were a little too close to last year’s model for me to get too excited.

Let’s be honest: the Pixel is not the sexiest device on the planet. Google never really sold it on its looks or sleek lines and there are plenty of phones that beat it the cosmetic department. The Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2 are slight modifications on the existing models but don’t stray very far for 2017.

I’m reminded of how Google’s early Chromebooks, the CR-48, were unfinished and basic looking. Further, it also calls to mind when we see devices with fake shells or cases that hide the final product.

This is not to say, though, that the other colors wouldn’t be a completely different experience. There’s something about the way Google mixes the black and white (with a hint of red on power button) that signals “modern Google”.

If you look at the new line of products as a whole, they all seem to fit. Even though they have different materials and do vastly different things, they feel cohesive and like they’re all part of a family. To me, though, the all black phones look like beta versions or unfinished takes on the more appealing counterparts.

This is all personal opinion, of course, and has nothing to do with a “review”. That is, unless you are like me and want to know if the new stuff is better looking or much more advanced than the old stuff.

If you are using a Google Pixel or Pixel XL now, there’s not enough here to outright suggest the upgrade. Find the right discount or incentive, such as switching carriers, and it’s easier to make the recommendation.

Jump back a generation to the Nexus 5X or 6P and it’s much more obvious. The hardware performance alone is worth the upgrade. Plus you’re dealing with much a smoother, and cohesive operating system in Android 8.0 Oreo. It’s Android as it is supposed to be done.

As for the actual build quality, I find no issues with the Pixel 2 or Pixel XL 2. The phones feel solid in hand, if not a little bit utilitarian. Looking the phone over and getting a feel for it, the Pixel 2 is more my style and fits my hand size. Last year’s Pixel XL was always just a little bit too big for me to fall in love with it, especially with a case on it.

This year’s Pixel XL 2 also verges on the edge of being too cumbersome to me. The Pixel 2 feels much more in line with what I like for reaching in the pocket, waking up, and using with one hand.

To be fair, the larger screen is great for just about all practical purposes. Reading text, watching video, and playing games all benefit from the extra space. Even the weight is almost negligible, too. The preference between the two is going to be a personal choice.

About that Pixel XL 2 Display

Before moving on, though, I definitely have to touch base on the difference in the tech behind the two displays. If you’ve been looking into pre-ordering the Pixel XL 2, you likely already know about the issues plaguing some users. Indeed, even pre-launch review units are experiencing burn-in and less than desirable image quality. Yes, after only a few days and weeks, there’s chatter about poor images and what figures to be burned in navigation bars.

For what it’s worth, I review unit does not have any of the problems. This is not, however,  to suggest it’s perfect. In fact, after powering both on and placing them next to each other, the first thing I noticed about the larger phone was that the picture was more blue-ish and more drab.

Dig around and you’ll find that this comes down to LG manufacturing the screen in the Pixel XL 2 and Samsung creating the one for the Pixel 2. On paper, the larger phone has the same screen size and tech as the V30. And, depending on how deep of a rabbit hole you climb into, you’ll find that the LG phone is not without its own issues.

Mileage will vary per user. Some of the loudest complaints come from the smallest crowds. You’ll find plenty of angry mob types on forums and threads but it could be a simple case of angry few making noise loud enough for all.

To be fair, some of the images I’ve seen online look downright nasty. Google definitely has its hands full right now as it tries to look into the issue and/or fix it. I have no doubt that Google will do its part to replace or repair the problem devices. Given the flagship nature of the phone, it doesn’t want this to last long.

Build Quality

The Pixel 2 is more squared off and slab-like than its predecessor. I happen to like the slight changes from the first generation, even if they’re minimal. There’s less glass than in last year’s phone, but it also give us less to scratch or scuff. As for the other material, the texture is more rough and gives a better grip.

A welcome change in this year’s line, water resistance, is one of the only gripes I had with last year’s model. Given that so many other phones come with the feature I come to expect it in any handset commanding flagship pricing. Really, it should be standard for all mobile devices.

You might go an entire year without needing water resistance, but the one time your phone catches a sudden rain or poolside cannonball splash, you’ll be glad it’s there. I appreciate that both the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2 have water resistance.

Flip the phones over and you’ll find that there’s a slight lip that encircles the rear camera. It’s a minimal protrusion but it’s worth pointing out. It doesn’t make them feel uneven when lying on the back, but there’s just enough here to catch on a surface or to potentially scuff. Put the handsets in a case and you won’t have any problems.

Ask your snobby friends to speak on the build of the Pixel phones and a common argument is that they have too big of a bezel. By ways of comparison, they sure do. Last year’s models we more prominent than the new phones; the Pixel 2 has more “wasted space” than its larger counterpart. There’s a justifiable reason.

Queue up some music or a YouTube video and give it a listen. Google moved the bottom speaker from below the handset into a position directly under the screen. The front-facing stereo setup is excellent and offers up an incredible sound. I suppose there could be just a little bit trimmed from the top and bottom bezels but I can’t imagine Google leaving extra space for no reason at all. Plus, it looks symmetrical when turned on its side.

Camera

Phone makers almost always brag about the camera experience on their devices, especially the bigger names who deliver flagships on a regular basis. Yes, they have gotten much better over the years, and the software experience always improves, too.

Google, for its part, made a very big deal out of its camera and the highest DxOMark score to date. After spending just a few days with the Pixel and Pixel XL it was very obvious that this was more than lip service and indistinguishable benchmarks. The Pixel camera was the real deal and its 90 score was incredible and well worth the praise.

For this year we find that Google has managed to up the ante even more, pulling in a commanding 98 DxOMark score. Beating all others again, I couldn’t wait to test the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2. Would it be incremental and something that matters only on paper?

Flickr Gallery of Camera Samples

Pixel 2 & Pixel XL 2 Camera Samples

I’ve already captured some incredible photos with excellent detail and very accurate color. The shutter is super fast, mowing through pictures at a rapid rate. Things will get even better over the next few months as Google enables the Pixel Visual Core. Suffice it to say, the out of box experience now is already a winner.

I look forward to testing out the optical image stabilization and electronic stabilization. The demo at Google’s unveiling tells us it should be almost revolutionary and change video captured on smartphones.

Performance

Man, I miss the headphone jack. My office is only a couple of miles from home, and I don’t travel too far around town, but I almost always have my phone plugged directly into my stereo. I wish I could tell you that I had Bluetooth in my truck but I don’t. In truth, pretty much all modern cars do have the technology, including my wife’s. Nevertheless, I love plugging in for Audible or Google Play Music because terrestrial radio sucks.

If you rely on an auxiliary cord on a regular basis, you’re going to take issue with the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2. Indeed, after mocking Apple and others for removing the plug only one year earlier, Google removed the 3.5mm jack from both phones.

I would have loved a pair of inexpensive Bluetooth earbuds in the box. Or, perhaps maybe a discount code for the new Pixel Buds. If the industry is going to evolve, Google and others should help make the changes easier.

Given the hardware that powers the Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2, you’d expect a snappy experience. You get that here; there’s nothing I’ve thrown at the phones yet that’s caused them to stutter or slow. Android 8.0 Oreo is as smooth as ever, building slightly on the great foundation that was 7.0 Nougat.

If there’s one word that I can use to sum up the Pixel line of devices it’s “cohesive”. For good reason, it’s the full Android experience as intended by Google. While they’re not yet a hardware manufacturer, Google does an excellent job in working with the platform and phone makers.

I’m a huge fan of how Google integrates its apps and services. The list of pre-loaded titles has evolved over the years but today’s suite feels appropriate. It skews a little more toward new smartphone adopters with Allo, Duo, and Messages, but longtime Google users can easily install Hangouts, Google+, or other apps.

As much as I like the idea of squeezing the phones to trigger Google Assistant, I don’t think I will be using it that often. There are already a number of ways to pull it up, some of which feel just as intuitive. I would really like a setting in the phone that lets me trigger an app or function. I’d use it much more if I could squeeze to launch email.

Conclusion

It’s really hard to throw shade at the Pixel 2 or Pixel XL 2, at least on paper. Display issues aside for the select few users of the Pixel XL 2, the general consensus seems to be that these phones are winners.

I love the fact that Google Photos lets me upload my pictures and videos at original resolution. Really, I’d enjoy that with any quality of camera, but it’s extra good when you have the top-rated smartphone camera on the market.

The Pixel 2 and Pixel XL 2 are nice steps forward in the family of devices; the changes are in the right areas and are appreciated. To me, it’s not worth the $200 difference to go for the larger model. That’s a personal preference, though, and a call you’ll have to make. For now, if you can wait until the display problems are cleared up by Google, I would suggest holding on just to be safe.

I would like to see wireless charging added to the Pixel line. To be honest, I was surprised that Google didn’t add it this time around. It’s not as if we’re still waiting on an industry standard to emerge.

Should you upgrade?

If you own an existing Pixel or Pixel XL, I am going to suggest sitting tight for now. There’s enough changed from last year to qualify as an upgrade, but it’s certainly evolutionary and not revolutionary. Given that your current model already has or is in the midst of receiving Android 8.0, you’re not missing out on much.

For everyone else, though… If you’re sitting on something older from another phone maker, the Pixel 2 is certainly worth a look.  There’s something to be said about a stripped down, lean version of Android, particularly if you’ve never experienced it. I encourage long time Samsung, LG, or HTC users to give it a try.

On a related note, I’ve always tried to sway friends and family away from buying phones through carriers. In addition to OEMs baking in the extra software and apps we often find things loaded by the service provider. You might not realize it, but all that junk matters.

Spend some time with a Nexus or Pixel phone and you’ll be tempted to stay with Google’s hardware. The total package gets better with each iteration and the 2017 bundle is a tough one to beat.

For $650 the Pixel 2 is definitely worth the price. It was the right cost for last year’s model and the updates for this just gives you more for the same cost. What’s more, it keeps you from wandering into that area of $800+ devices that look sexier but really just do the same stuff. You’ll have to figure out for yourself if it’s worth the cost difference to go with the XL 2.

She’s not the most beautiful girl in school, but she is super smart and really understands your needs. You won’t go broke dating her for awhile, you’ll have a lot of fun together, and you may come to appreciate that the important stuff is below the surface.

Samsung to start Android 8.0 Oreo in early 2018, reports suggest

0

Google released Android 8.0 Oreo on August 21, 2017, and with Android Oreo now available on Google’s Pixel and Nexus devices, the question comes down to the following: when will other handset makers and OEMS release it for their respective handsets?

Sony has already released its first Android Oreo handset, the Xperia XZ1 and rolled out Oreo to the XZ Premium; Motorola has provided its Oreo update list so as to not keep its customers in the dark.

Samsung has brought an Android Oreo Samsung Pay beta to Galaxy S8 users, so the Korean OEM is certainly interested in rolling out Google’s newest sweet treat as soon as possible. According to Samsung Turkey, Samsung users can expect the Android Oreo rollout for current Samsung Galaxy smartphones to begin in “early 2018.”

The timeframe provided doesn’t give away too many details. First, it’s noteworthy that this suggested release could merely apply to Turkey or European users, not necessarily US Galaxy users – so American buyers may have to wait longer before Oreo lands on their devices.

Next, the expected early 2018 Oreo rollout date is slightly slower than Google’s promise on the day of the Oreo rollout, that, “by the end of this year, hardware makers including Samsung are scheduled to launch or upgrade devices to Android 8.0 Oreo.” Samsung was expected to begin the rollout of Android Oreo by the end of this year. Turkey could receive the update later than everyone, but it’s highly unlikely seeing that the country often receives updates first.

Samsung finds itself in a curious position, with even the Galaxy Note 8 as an Android Nougat handset. The Galaxy Note 8 launched with Nougat, which was expected, but as Samsung’s newest (and best) handset of 2017, Oreo couldn’t arrive any faster to keep up sales momentum.

As for which devices that are set to receive the update, the Galaxy Note 8, Galaxy S8, and Galaxy S8+, are expected to be the first of the “Galaxy” for Android Oreo. The Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 edge are expected to get Oreo as well, which will bring the new Note 8 UI to the S7 series.

As for what Galaxy users can expect with Android Oreo, Samsung Turkey says that Samsung will bring new features such as Picture-in-Picture (PiP) mode, which is common to the Oreo update, as well as predictive text selection, new emojis, and a Night Mode to improve upon Samsung’s current Blue Filter in high-end devices such as the Galaxy Note 8 and Galaxy S8 series.

Samsung Galaxy users, what do you think of the early 2018 Oreo rollout date? Excited? Disappointed? Want to see something in the update you haven’t heard of yet?

Mekorama is Monument Valley without the gloom (review)

Most mobile devices owners are at least aware of an immensely popular game called Monument Valley. It’s a puzzle platformer; but that’s not what made it a standout. Instead what made it so unique was two main things:

  1. It’s very original visual scheme.
  2. It’s very deep/philosophical storyline.

While the art & visuals were just fantastic and almost impossible to find fault with, some people (including yours truly) did see the storyline as being borderline too melancholy, philosophical, and overall deep. I mean, we’re talking about a mobile game here; not a life-changing experience, am I right? It actually became difficult to play it for long periods, as it almost got gloomier the longer you stayed with it. Oh, and it also is a paid game, which can turn some players off to start with.

Perhaps you’re looking for a similar but free gameplay experience. Or you’d like your kiddo to try out this type of game, but not worry about them being lost in all the gloom, an excellent candidate would be Mekorama, by Martin Magni. Let’s take it for a spin to see all there is to see on this great Android game.

Setup & Storyline

I’ve put setup & storyline in the same section of this review because, well, there isn’t much to either. Setup is simply downloading from the Play Store and starting the game. After a tutorial level you are left to go explore on your own.

I’m honestly not sure there really is a storyline here. Per the developer, “Mekorama is a mobile puzzle game where you help a tiny robot stumble home”. That’s it; that’s the premise. A big part of the game’s charm is the tiny robot itself….it’s a cute, almost bumbling little R2D2-esque tin-can droid. You are initially given 50 cards (levels) to conquer, using your sense of your spatial intelligence, deduction, and some neat 3-D perspective command the game offers you.

Gameplay

If you have played or even seen Monument Valley before, then you already have the knowledge on how this game works. The robot stands before you, awaiting your command. You move him around the level by way of tapping a square where you want him/her (it?) to go. Each level has a square with a red dot on it; that’s your target. The problem is that each levels has a unique series of physical obstacles for you to conquer….be it a hole in the trail of squares, a vertical gap, or a Rube Goldberg-type of action puzzle to solve, to get from one place to another.

To see how to best solve each problem, your main on-screen weapon is the ability to spin the screen left and right, flying around the level in a circular fly-by pattern, stopping exactly where you want to, so you can find the secret to solving your conundrum.

Like most platformers, the levels start out simple enough, but graduate in both their variety and complexity to challenge you more and more as you progress. Eventually you end up with both allies and enemies compounding your troubles in further levels.

The gameplay is very relaxed and simple, allowing quick pick-up and put-down, letting you jump back in on a moment’s notice. This is another advantage (in my opinion) over the likes of Monument Valley, large time chunks of each level is dedicated to scripted, drawn-out animations. Mekorama seems to purposely be the antithesis of this….I’ve rarely seen a game that so elegantly lets you go in & out of gameplay at your leisure. And it’s appreciated.

If VR is your thing, there’s also a Dreamcast version available in the Play Store (not free, I’m afraid).

Visuals and Sound

Mekorama is grand in its visual presentation, bringing an extremely clean aesthetic with enough color to capture the eye (and keep kiddos entertained), while not being overly painted-looking. 3-D depth and motion matches the leisurely, pleasing effect of the gameplay, while the animations are intentionally slowed down so as to bring a calming influence. Not trying make it sound sleepy here, but there is just the right amount of pacing that keeps your heart rate at a good, even pace while playing.

For sound, I have a little less to say on it. It stays in the background, for the most part, push a series of rather cartoony music, beeps, boops, and synth throughout gameplay. Which is just fine; as both the visuals and the puzzles are meant to be on center-stage, anyway.

Social

Level Builder…built right in.

Beyond the 50 developer-supplied cards to play, Martin Magni has a couple of ways to extend your enjoyment of this title. Downloads of additional developer-created cards, and a built-in level builder, allowing fellow players to build their own levels and offer them to everyone else for download.

There are literally thousands of fan-made levels out there for you to download & try…another fun twist on an already pretty fantastic gaming experience.

Overall

Mekorama is an excellent mobile title if you are looking for a pleasurable visual experience that will tax your problem-solving skills as much as you’re willing to consume it, then let you set it down until next time. But fair warning: putting it down can be a challenge in itself.

Download Mekorama from the Play Store here.

MetroPCS debuts 4 line plan with unlimited LTE for $100

0

MetroPCS unveiled a plan with 2 lines of unlimited 4G LTE data, talk, and text for just $75 a month a few weeks ago; however, the T-Mobile-owned MVNO is not finished yet.

MetroPCS is now back with an even better deal: 4 lines of unlimited 4G LTE data, talk, and text for just $100. For those keeping score, that’s double the lines for just $25 more.

The new MetroPCS four-line unlimited promo comes with some important caveats. For starters, and as is the case with most wireless carriers, expect to have video streaming at just 480p, with reduced speeds in heavy web congestion. Next, users who consume over 356GB monthly will find their speeds reduced due to the prioritization of other customers. Few use this much data each month, but just know that there’s a limit to “unlimited.”

MetroPCS is not only offering a competitive offer to rival other MVNOs and big carriers, but also gives another sweet deal baked in: for those that port over four numbers (one for each four-member family) to MetroPCS from another carrier, the MVNO will give switchers four free phones of their choice, such as the LG K20 Plus, Lenovo Moto E4, Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime, and the Samsung Galaxy J3 Prime.

Metro has offered two LG K20 Plus handsets to carrier switchers this summer, so those who don’t need four lines can inquire about this deal.

Competition

To be sure, there are more competitive unlimited data plans out there. Sprint’s promo earlier this year offered 5 lines with unlimited 4G, talk, and text for just $90, but of course, Sprint’s network may not appeal to you. Verizon may be the best national network of them all (the evidence speaks for itself), but you’ll end up paying $160-$200 monthly with Big Red’s new Unlimited plans.

MetroPCS says that this four-line promo is for a limited time only, meaning that as good a deal as it is, it won’t last forever. What’re you waiting for?

Nokia debuts Android 8.0 Oreo beta labs

0

Good news Nokia fans. HMD Global just announced the Nokia phones beta labs which will allow Nokia phone users to test Android Oreo before it gets released on a public scale.

For the time being, only owners of the Nokia 8 are eligible to join the program, but according to the company’s Chief Product Officer, Juho Sarvikas the beta labs will soon be able to accommodate owners of the Nokia 3, Nokia 5, Nokia 6.

Speaking of which, the Nokia 6 is no longer an Amazon exclusive and customers can will so be able to purchase it from Best Buy. But we diverge.

As a Nokia 8 owners looking to join the beta labs, all you need to do is sign up and validate your device’s IMEI number. Once the company clears you, you should receive the OTA within 12 hours. Or you can check manually to see if the new build is available by checking Settings> About Phone > System Updates.

The beta testers will be first in line to receive the Android 8.0 Oreo update and Nokia expects them to report dutifully with any bugs or issues they might have encountered. You can use the dedicated Feedback up to submit your feedback or by posting on the Nokia phones community. Happy testing!